Linux Help
guides forums blogs
Home Desktops Distributions ISO Images Logos Newbies Reviews Software Support & Resources Linuxhelp Wiki

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



Advanced DNS Management
New ZoneEdit. New Managment.

FREE DNS Is Back

Sign Up Now
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Package Managers, Which one to learn?
sixtwoten
post Jun 30 2005, 07:53 AM
Post #1


Whats this Lie-nix Thing?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 23-May 05
Member No.: 5,028



My research has shown a few package managers in Linux being used extensively. They are rpm, dbpkg, yum, and apt-get. A person new to Linux (like myself) gets confused on what to learn to use to install software and applications. Is there any resource that can help determine the solution to this dilemma? I want to remain as vendor-neutral and as close to standards as possible.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
DS2K3
post Jun 30 2005, 09:43 AM
Post #2


Its GNU/Linuxhelp.net
*******

Group: Support Specialist
Posts: 1,284
Joined: 14-November 04
From: Southampton, Hampshire
Member No.: 4,165



yum is an rpm front-end, (so is apt-get). I really depends what distribution you are using. None of the package managers are difficult to use though, and tools like yum only take a matter of minutes to learn.

With yum, you would normally just run "yum install name_of_package"

Short of compiling software yourself, there is no "standard" way of installing things, although RPM is pretty widely used.

D


--------------------
Fixed your problem? Let us know!
richard@linuxhelp.net

www.Gathr.co.uk Online Event Management
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
ncsuapex
post Jul 3 2005, 11:03 AM
Post #3


Whats this Lie-nix Thing?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 15
Joined: 16-December 04
Member No.: 4,353



I use Debian and I prefer apt-get. I tried using yum on a Red Hat 9 system and ended up totally screwing my system up to the point I had to reinstall. I'm not 100% sure on this but I think apt-get is better at making sure dependecies are met.


Whatever you use, it's best to install all of your pacakges with that same package manager. You'll have less headaches when you go to update, remove, etc,
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
matt
post Jul 3 2005, 11:17 AM
Post #4


./configure
***

Group: Members
Posts: 104
Joined: 8-April 05
From: St John's Newfoundland
Member No.: 4,844



I use Slackware which has pkgtool. Same concept. installpkg packagename. But also it has a converter to convert debs and rpms to slackware packages and reciently they added slapt-get to make life even better. which is exacly the same a apt-get only for slackware packages. I guess the only ""standard"" way to install software on all distros is but compiling from source with the good old ./configure, make and make install commands. But then again thats not always the case, some new distros dont come standard with all your developer tools and libaries. anyway thats my 2 cents. smile.gif


--------------------
INTEL Q6600 Quad Core @2.8
Evga Geforce 8800GT SSC Ed 512
ASUS P5N32-E SLI Deluxe
4G DDR2 - 1 750 Gig HDS
Distro - Slackware-Current / KDE4 / Window Xp MC
---------------------------------------
Distro - Slackware 12 MythTV Box
AMD Athlon 64 3500+
1024 Megs of DDR400
200G HD
Nvidia 8400 GT
Leadtech Winfast TV2000 Tuner
Antec NSK2480 Media Center Case
--------------------------------------
Linux User #384299
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 22nd October 2017 - 02:24 PM