Linux Help
guides forums blogs
Home Desktops Distributions ISO Images Logos Newbies Reviews Software Support & Resources Linuxhelp Wiki

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )



Advanced DNS Management
New ZoneEdit. New Managment.

FREE DNS Is Back

Sign Up Now
 
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Need Help, need linux to run 200mmx
azepromidi3000
post Dec 14 2003, 12:15 AM
Post #1


Grub-er
**

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 11-December 03
Member No.: 1,937



is there a linux out that can run on this machine huh.gif


200mmx cpu
128mb
10 gb harddrive
4 1.1 usb
8mb vidreo card
52 speed cd rom
10/100 lan network card
creative labs 128 sound card
please


sad.gif


because of this box i can also update the mother and cpu because my box is at atx box but i don't wish to because this box has been my favour box to play in!!!!! please can you help me sad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hughesjr
post Dec 14 2003, 02:55 PM
Post #2


Its GNU/Linuxhelp.net
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,433
Joined: 25-July 03
From: Corpus Chrsiti, TX, USA
Member No.: 1,151



That meets the minumum requirements for RH 8/9 and mandrake 9, 9.1, 9.2.

It will be slow, it would be better if you could bump up the RAM...

I am running a 192mb pII 333 laptop and it is OK ... with 128mb it was much slower.


--------------------
Johnny Hughes
hughesjr@linuxhelp.net
Enterprise Alternatives: CentOS, WhiteBoxEL
Favorite Workstation Distros (in order): CentOS, Gentoo, Debian Sarge, Ubuntu, Mandrake, FedoraCore, Slackware, SUSE
Favorite Server Distros (in order): CentOS, WhiteBoxEL, Debian Sarge, Slackware, Mandrake, FedoraCore, Gentoo, SUSE
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
azepromidi3000
post Dec 14 2003, 07:22 PM
Post #3


Grub-er
**

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 11-December 03
Member No.: 1,937



thank your Sir for that biggrin.gif


just other question how much hard drive does these os take full installing with network drives, sound card and videro card drivers is 10 gb going to be find or more hard drive needed!!!
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hughesjr
post Dec 15 2003, 07:06 AM
Post #4


Its GNU/Linuxhelp.net
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,433
Joined: 25-July 03
From: Corpus Chrsiti, TX, USA
Member No.: 1,151



A full install (everything) with RH or Mandrake is about 5gb ... a normal install is more like 2.5-3 gb, so 10 gb should be good for most purposes.


--------------------
Johnny Hughes
hughesjr@linuxhelp.net
Enterprise Alternatives: CentOS, WhiteBoxEL
Favorite Workstation Distros (in order): CentOS, Gentoo, Debian Sarge, Ubuntu, Mandrake, FedoraCore, Slackware, SUSE
Favorite Server Distros (in order): CentOS, WhiteBoxEL, Debian Sarge, Slackware, Mandrake, FedoraCore, Gentoo, SUSE
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
azepromidi3000
post Dec 16 2003, 01:05 AM
Post #5


Grub-er
**

Group: Members
Posts: 25
Joined: 11-December 03
Member No.: 1,937



thanks for that hughesjr biggrin.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
mno
post Dec 16 2003, 07:09 PM
Post #6


Whats this Lie-nix Thing?
*

Group: Members
Posts: 4
Joined: 16-December 03
From: Toronto, Canada
Member No.: 1,973



Some more recommendations: I would not suggest running any GUI off of that configuration. I have a Celeron 733Mhz with 512MB RAM and X takes for ever to start. Let alone do anything once it's started. I use RedHat 7.3 and I specifically didn't install X at all. I'm just regretting that I installed 7.3 instead of 9, but that's details...

Regarding the Mandrake / RedHat choice: Mandrake is more for newer users. However, as soon as you get more familiar, it's a pain to install any good packages since it comes with nothing (at least 7.1 did, when I first tried it a while ago). You will need to install 80% of the modules the package you want to install depends on for the first little while. RedHat is a lot better in this case, although it's not very new-user friendly. However, after 5 installs of Linux, I got the hang of it and even got Apache, PHP, MySQL to work (all built, not installed via RPMs) and I'm currently using the system as a testing server. Well, I will, once I get the stupid network card to work again. A word of warning: don't do any security patching of sorts if you're just going to play around with it or not do any serious work or be always connected to the Net with it. For me, patching messed up some part of the original install 60% of the time, including the current 2.4.20 patch that messed up my eth0 config mad.gif
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
hughesjr
post Dec 17 2003, 01:35 AM
Post #7


Its GNU/Linuxhelp.net
*******

Group: Admin
Posts: 3,433
Joined: 25-July 03
From: Corpus Chrsiti, TX, USA
Member No.: 1,151



Patching is extremely important IF your machine is behind a firewall, but you have incoming ports forwarded to the machine ... (like incoming http, mail, ssh, ftp etc.).

Patching is absolutely critical if you are using a linux box as a firewall (or if it is touching the internet and not behind another firewall) ... or your box will be hacked into and 0wned...as in:

0wned - A computing facility that has been entirely compromised, usually in terms of integrity, due to hacking activities.
----------------------------------------
If you are running unpatched Linux boxes that allow incoming taffic, please do your self (and us) a favor and download and install chkrootkit.

Here is just one of the latest incidents .... and here is an outstanding article (older...from 2001, but still relavant) on hacked linux machines.

Not to mention that Debian and Gentoo were just compromised...and the GNU Project was compromised in August.

From the Honeynet Project:
Data from the Honeynet Project suggests that almost 80 percent of all un-patched servers wouldn't last more than three weeks before being compromised by Internet attackers.

Check out these stats...

Not patching your linux system, if it allows incoming traffic, is a timebomb waiting to happen....


--------------------
Johnny Hughes
hughesjr@linuxhelp.net
Enterprise Alternatives: CentOS, WhiteBoxEL
Favorite Workstation Distros (in order): CentOS, Gentoo, Debian Sarge, Ubuntu, Mandrake, FedoraCore, Slackware, SUSE
Favorite Server Distros (in order): CentOS, WhiteBoxEL, Debian Sarge, Slackware, Mandrake, FedoraCore, Gentoo, SUSE
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 



RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 23rd October 2017 - 03:14 AM